12
Sep

Johannes Wollebius on the Permissive Decree

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism   in Divine Permission of Sin

Wollebius:

III. Besides the will of God, there are no causes which can be contrary to his will. Many things indeed can be contrary to what God wants [voluntas signi], which nevertheless conform to the divine plan [voluntas beneplaciti]. God did not will man’s sin, and indeed most strictly forbade it. Nevertheless, at the same time he decreed it according to his will [beneplaciti], as a means of revealing his glory.

IV. Both good and evil, therefore, result from the decree and will of God; the former he causes, and the latter he permits.

V. Nevertheless, the decree and will of God are in no sense the cause of evil or sin, although whatever God decrees takes place of necessity. Since evils are decreed not effectively, but permissively, the decree of God is not the cause of evil. Nor are the decrees of God the cause of evil on account of the inevitability of their result, since they bring about results not by a coercive necessity but merely by an immutable one.

Johannes Wollebius, Compendium Theologiae Christianae,” in John W. Beardslee III, Reformed Dogmatics (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker, 1977), 48. [Originally published in 1626. Keep in mind this is a smaller dogmatic work and so his comments on various topics will not be extensive.]

11
Sep

Johannes Wollebius on the Providence of God

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism   in Divine Providence

Wollebius:

The actual providence of God is that work by which God not on preserves his creatures, but governs all things with unlimited [immensus] wisdom, goodness, power, justice, and mercy.

I. To deny providence is to deny God.

II. Actual providence differs from eternal providence as the execution of a decree differs from the decree.

III. In eternal providence what God intends to do, in actual providence what he wants, is uppermost.

IV. Providence consists not only of knowledge, but of the governance of all things, from the greatest to the least.

V. The providence of God does not destroy secondary causes, but upholds them.

VI. From the standpoint of providence, events which are contingent with respect to secondary causes are necessary. But it is the necessity of immutability, not of coercion.

VII. The providence of God is very different from Stoic fatalism. Stoic fatalism binds God in the net of secondary causes; Christian [teaching] subordinates secondary causes to the absolutely free will of God, which employs them freely, not of necessity, not because them, but because he wants them.

VIII. Both good and evil deeds are controlled by the providence of God.

IX. Good deeds are controlled by his effective act, under which heading belong the divine prevenience [praecursus] , concurrence [concursus] and support [succursus].

X. Evil deeds are controlled by realized [actuosus] permission, and hence by allowing, limiting, and directing them.

XI. The providence of God is always free from disorder and sin, even in connection with disorderly and sinful acts.

Read the rest of this entry »

14
Aug

Antecedent/Consequent Will

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism   in

‘Antecedent/Consequent Will’

  1. Chrysostom (347-407) on the Will of God for the Salvation of All Men: With Reference to God’s Precedent Will
  2. John of Damascus (675/6-749) on the Antecedent and Consequent Will
  3. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274): Can The Divine Will Be Distinguished into Antecedent and Consequent?
  4. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) on Predestination and Reprobation
  5. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) on 1 Timothy 2:4
  6. Peter Martyr Vermigli (1499-1563) on 1 Timothy 2:4
  7. Peter Martyr Vermigli (1499-1563) on Matthew 23:37
  8. Girolamo Zanchi (1516–1590) the Conditional Will of God
  9. Richard Hooker (1554-1600) on the Death of Christ (Select Comments)
  10. Amandus Polanus (1561-1610) on the Will of God
  11. John Cameron (1579-1625) on the Death of Christ
  12. Johannes Wollebius (1586-1629) on God’s Conditional Revealed Will
  13. Anthony Burgess (d. 1644) (Westminster Divine) on Ezekiel 33:11
  14. Bishop Joseph Hall (1574–1656), on “Conditional Decree” and “Will” in early Reformation theology
  15. Johannes Bergius (1587-1658) on God’s Will and Desire for the Salvation of All Men
  16. John Davenant (1572–1641) on God’s Will for the Salvation of All Men With Reference to His Gracious Gifts to Men
  17. William Greenhill (1591-1671) on Ezekiel 18:23, 32 and 33:11
  18. Joseph Truman (1631–1671) on the Love of God: General and Special
  19. Richard Maden (ca. 1591-1677) on God’s Will for the Salvation of all Men: With Reference to Psalm 18:13, Matthew 23:37, 1 Timothy 2:2-4, and 2 Peter 3:9
  20. Thomas Manton (1620-1677) on Ezekiel 18:23
  21. Richard Baxter (1615-1691) on the Distinction between Christ’s Antecedent and Consequent Acts and Will With Respect to the Death of Christ
  22. Matthew Henry (1662-1714) on Ezekiel 18:23, 32; and 33:7-9 and 11
  23. Hermann Venema (1697-1787) on Conditional Decree
23
Feb

Name Index [W-X]

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism   in

A-B C-D E-F G-H I-J K-L M-N O-P Q-R S-T U-V W-X Y-Z

 

Walaeus, Antonius (1573-1639)

Synopsis Purioris Theologiae (1625) on God’s Providence With Regard to Sin and Divine Permission

Waldren, Samuel

Samuel Waldron on God’s Will and Desire for the Salvation of All Men

Samuel Waldron on the Free Offer in Relation to God’s Desire that All Men Be Saved

Walker, George (1581–1651)

George Walker (Westminster Divine) on the Death of Christ

George Walker (Westminster Divine) on Divine Permission of Sin

Walker, James (1821-1891)

James Walker on the revision of the Sufficient-Efficient formula

Wardlaw, Ralph (1779-1853)

Ralph Wardlaw on the Extent of the Atonement

Ralph Wardlaw on Supralapsarianism

Ralph Wardlaw on the Double Payment Fallacy

Ralph Wardlaw on the Satisfaction of Christ in Relation to the Free Offer

Ralph Wardlaw on Quantitative Equivalency Versus Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ

Ralph Wardlaw on John 3:16

Ralph Wardlaw on John 17:9

Ralph Wardlaw on the World of John 17:21 in Relation to the World of John 17:9

Ralph Wardlaw on 2 Peter 3:9

Ware, Bruce

Bruce Ware on God’s Universal Saving Revealed Will for the Salvation of All Men

Bruce Ware on God’s General and Special Love

Warfield, B.B. (1851-1921)

B.B. Warfield on the Removal of Legal Obstacles: An Exercise in Missing the Point

Edmund Calamy (1600-1666), (Westminster Divine), on the Divine Intentionality of the Revealed Will

Warne, Jonathan

Jonathan Warne on God’s Will for the Salvation of All Men

Warren, Thomas (1616-1694)

Thomas Warren on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment

Waterman, Elijah (1769-1825)

Elijah Waterman on Calvin on the Extent of the Atonement

Watts, Isaac (1674–1748)

Isaac Watts on Calvin on th Extent of the Atonement

Watson, Thomas (1620-1686)

Thomas Watson on Divine Mercy

Thomas Watson on Conditional Satisfaction (Contra Owen’s Double Payment Trilemma)

Thomas Watson on the Sufficiency and Efficiency of Christ’s Death

Weeks, William R. (1783-1848)

William R. Weeks on the Will and Desire of God for the Salvation of All Men in Relation to the Sincere Gospel Offer

William R. Weeks on the Sufficiency of Christ’s Death Classically Defined and Defended

William R. Weeks on the Distinction Between Atonement and Redemption

William R. Weeks on the Distinction Between Natural Ability and Volition

The Exclusivity of the Intercession of Christ and the Argument for Limited Atonement

Welch, Ransom B. (1824-1890)

Ransom B. Welch on James Richards (1767-1843) on the Death of Christ

Ransom B. Welch on the Distinction Between Atonement and Redemption

Whately, William (1583-1639)

William Whately on God’s Willingness to Pardon All

William Whately Referencing Ezekiel 18:23

White, John (1570-1615)

John White on God’s Ordination and the Freedom of Man

Whitefield, George (1714-1770)

George Whitefield on God’s Love for All Declared in the Gospel

Williams, Daniel (1643?-1716)

Daniel Williams on Christ Suffering the Just Equivalent Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment

Williams, Edward (1750-1813)

Edward Williams on Calvin on the Extent of the Atonement

Williams, Gryffith (1589?-1672)

Gryffith Williams on Conditional Satisfaction (Contra the Double-Payment dilemma)

Gryffith Williams on John 17:9

Willet, Andrew (1562-1621)

Andrew Willet on Romans 2:4

Andrew Willet on 2 Peter 2:1 by way of Jude 4

Andrew Willet on Calvin on the Extent of the Atonement

Wilson, Thomas (1563-1622)

Thomas Wilson on the General and Special Love of God

Thomas Wilson on Faith as Assurance

Thomas Wilson on Romans 2:4-5

Witsius, Herman (1636-1708)

Herman Witsius on General Love

Herman Witsius on the Revised Sufficient-Efficient Formula

Herman Witsius on Christ Suffering the Just Equivalent Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment

Wodrow, Robert (1679-1734)

Robert Wodrow on John Cameron (1579-1625) on the Conditional Decree to Salvation and the Unconditional Decree to Faith

Wollebius, Johannes (1586-1629)

Johannes Wollebius on Common Special Grace in the Light of Depravity Due to Sin

Johannes Wollebius on Reprobation

Johannes Wollebius on the Providence of God

Johannes Wollebius on Fall of Man and God’s Providence and Decree

Johannes Wollebius on the Permissive Decree

Johannes Wollebius on the Sufficiency of Christ’s Satisfaction

Johannes Wollebius on God’s Conditional Revealed Will

Woodbridge, Benjamin (1622-1684)

Benjamin Woodbridge on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment

Woods, Leonard (1774-1854)

Leonard Woods on the Extent of the Atonement

Leonard Woods on 2 Peter 2:1

Leonard Woods on the Distinction between Pecuniary and Penal Satisfaction

Leonard Woods on Quantitative Equivalency Versus Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ

Wycliffe, John (1320s?-1384)

John Wycliffe on the Parables of the Lost Sheep and the Lost Coin

John Wycliffe on John 1:29

 

8
May

Sources on ‘Conditional Decree/Will’

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism   in

‘Conditional Decree/Will’

Predestination/Election

  1. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) on Conditional Predestination
  2. Erasmus Sarcerius on Conditional Predestination
  3. Martin Bucer (1491-1551) on Conditional Predestination
  4. John Calvin (1509-1564) on the General Election of Israel
  5. Amyraut (1596-1664) on Conditional Predestination
  6. William Twisse (1578–1646) on Bucer (1491-1551) on Conditional Predestination
  7. Jacob Kimedoncius (d. 1596) on Wolfgang Musculus (1497-1563): All Men Conditionally Appointed to Life
  8. Girolamo Zanchi (1516-1590) on All Men are Bound to Believe in their Election in Christ
  9. William Twisse (1578–1646) on Zanchi on Conditional Election
  10. John Davenant (1572–1641) on Bucer (with Zanchi) on ‘Each Man is Bound to Believe he has been Elected’
  11. William Sclater (1575-1627) on Zanchi on ‘Each Man is Bound to Believe he has been Elected’
  12. Experience Mayhew (1673-1758) on William Twisse (1578–1646) on “Each Man is Bound to Believe that Christ Died for Him”
  13. Matthew Harmon on Moses Amyraut (1596-1664) on ‘General Conditional Election’

Decree

  1. John Cameron (1579-1625) on the Order of the Decrees
  2. Robert Wodrow (1679-1734) on John Cameron (1579-1625) on the Conditional Decree to Salvation and the Unconditional Decree to Faith
  3. John Davenant (1572–1641) on Conditional Decree
  4. Bishop Joseph Hall (1574–1656), on “Conditional Decree,” “Will,” and “intention” in Early Reformation Theology
  5. Moses Amyraut (1596-1664) on God’s Conditional Decree
  6. Moses Amyraut (1596-1664)and Paul Testard (1594-1650) and the Synod of Alancon on ‘Conditional Will,’ ‘Conditional Decree,’ and ‘Conditional Predestination’
  7. Richard Baxter (1615-1691) on God’s Conditional Decree
  8. Edward Polhill on ‘Conditional Decree’ as Will Revealed
  9. Hermann Venema (1697-1787) on Conditional Decree

Intention

  1. John Davenant (1572–1641) on the Conditional and Revealed ‘Intention’ of God for the Salvation of All Men
  2. Edmund Calamy (1600-1666), Westminster Divine, on the Divine Intentionality of the Revealed Will
  3. Theophilus Gale (1628-1678) on the Divine Intentionality of the Revealed Will

Will

  1. The Hungarian Confessio Catholica (1562) on God’s General Conditional and Saving Will
  2. John Calvin (1509-1564) on God’s Conditional Will
  3. Girolamo Zanchi (1516–1590) the Conditional Will of God
  4. John Davenant (1572–1641) on Ezekiel 33:11 and 18:32; With Reference to God’s “Conditional Will”
  5. Moses Amyraut (1596-1664) on God’s Conditional Will for the Salvation of All Men
  6. Amandus Polanus (1561-1610) on God’s Conditional Revealed Will
  7. Henry Ainsworth (1571-1622) on God’s Conditional Will for the Salvation of All Men
  8. Johannes Wollebius on God’s Conditional Revealed Wil
  9. Ezekiel Culverwell (1553/4-1631) on God’s Conditonal Will in Relation to the Free Offer of the Gospel
  10. Richard Maden (ca. 1591-1677) on God’s Will for the Salvation of all Men: With Reference to Psalm 18:13, Matthew 23:37, 1 Timothy 2:2-4, and 2 Peter 3:9
  11. Edward Leigh (1602-1671) on God’s Conditional Revealed Will
  12. Nathanael Ball (1623–1681) on Christ’s Absolute and Conditional Will
  13. Richard Baxter (1615-1691) on God’s Conditional Will