Qualitative Equivalency Versus Quantitative Equivalency

1. Zachary Ursinus (1534–1583) on Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ
2. John Ball (1585-1640) on Equalency Versus Identity in Christ’s Sufferings
3. Abraham Clifford (fl. 1642) on on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
4. Joseph Truman (1631-1671) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
5. Patrick Gillespie (1617-1675) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
6. Thomas Manton (1620-1677) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
7. Benjamin Woodbridge (1622-1684) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
8. Richard Baxter (1615-1691) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
9. Thomas Warren (1616-1694) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
10. Herman Witsius (1636-1708) on Christ Suffering the Just Equivalent Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
11. Matthew Henry (1662-1714) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
12. Daniel Williams (1643?-1716) on Christ Suffering the Just Equivalent Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
13. John Gibbon (1629-1718) on Death of Christ: Penal Not Pecuniary and Tantundem Not Idem
14. William Symington (1764-1831): Christ Did Not Suffer So Much For So Much Sin
15. William Symington (1764-1831): “Exact Equivalency” Voids the Sincere Offer of the Gospel
16. John Dick (1764-1833) on Christ Suffering the Just Equivalent Not the Quantum of the Law’s Punishment
17. Ralph Wardlaw (1779-1853) on Quantitative Equivalency Versus Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ
18. Leonard Woods (1774-1854) on Quantitative Equivalency Versus Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ
19. William Cunningham (1805-1861) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment: With Attention to John Owen
20. William Lindsay Alexander (1808-1884) on Quantitative Equivalency Versus Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ: With Attention to John Owen
21. W.G.T. Shedd (1820–1894) on Quantitative Equivalency Versus Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ
22. Robert L. Dabney (1820-1898) on Quantitative Equivalency Versus Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ
23. Robert L. Dabney (1820-1898) on Quantitative Equivalency and the Extent of the Satisfaction, With Replies from A.A. Porter and B.M. Palmer (1818-1902)
24. Alan C. Clifford on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment: Contra John Owen

Mediating

1. Thomas Brooks (1608-1680) on Christ Suffering the Idem and the Tantundem: A Mediating
2. Thomas Jacombe (1623-1687) on Christ Suffering the Idem and the Tantundem: A Mediating Position
3. Edward Polhill (1622-1694) on Christ Suffering the Idem and the Tantundem: A Mediating Position
4. Samuel Petto (ca. 1624-1711) on Christ Suffering the Idem of the Law’s Punishment

Contra

1. John Owen (1616-1683) on Christ Suffering the Idem, Not the Tantundem of the Law’s Punishment
2. George Payne (1781-1848) on John Owen on Christ Suffering the Exact Quantum of Punishment Due to the Elect
3. John L. Dagg (1794-1884) on Christ Suffering So Much for So Much Sin: Speculation Taking Us Down the Wrong Road
4. William J. Styles on Christ Suffering So Much for So Much Sin