Notice: register_sidebar_widget is deprecated since version 2.8.0! Use wp_register_sidebar_widget() instead. in /home/q85ho9gucyka/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3931
Calvin and Calvinism » John 3:16

Archive for the ‘John 3:16’ Category

18
Nov

John Howe on John 3:16

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism

Howe:

All this we have in that most admirable text of Scripture, (John 3. 16.) “God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” So loved! The matter is signified in such a way, as to leave all men amazed! and by their astonishment to supply their most detective conception of so stupendous a love. The world is an indefinite term, that contains the special and the afterwards specified object of this love; not a single person, but a whole race of intelligent creatures, a world inhabited by such, that were not to be left, and finally all swallowed up together in one common ruin; that upon this account he gave his only begotten Son to death, as the event and known design shewed. And how inconceivable must his love be to his only begotten Son! “The Brightness of his glory, the express Image of his person!” Always his Delight ! Yet rather than all this world should be lost for ever, He is thus given up! “That whosoever believe on him, should not perish, &c.” which expresses the certain, specified, declared object of this love: leaving them certainly excluded, who, after sufficient proposal, refuse their homage to the throne of Immanuel; choose rather their forlorn souls should be for ever forsaken of the divine presence, than unite with him, and surrender themselves to him, by whom alone they might be refitted, animated again, and inhabited as his living temples. Their exclusion is necessary, by such measures as those, by which such means were necessary to the salvation and blessedness of the others. But who can doubt hereupon, but that this course was indispensably necessary to this end? Especially if (reviewing that first-mentioned text) we consider, that our Lord represents his laying down his life as an un-expressible additional endearment of him to the Father: as if he should say, “O thou Son of my delights, thou hast now set my love to lost souls at liberty, that hath been ever pregnant with great and godlike designs towards them, and that must otherwise have been under perpetual restraint:” which is, [3.] Most evidently implied. But it may be said, Could the love of God be under restraint? And I say No, it could not; therefore to the all-comprehending Mind, where ends and means lie connected together under one permanent, eternal view, this course presented itself, as peculiarly accommodate to this end ; and was therefore eternally determined by easy concert between the Father and the Son, not to remedy, but prevent any such restraint. Yet it may be further urged, Cannot the absoluteness and omnipotency of a God enable him to satisfy his own propensions, if it were to save ever so many thousand worlds of offending creatures, without taking such a circuit as this? It was once said to a human mortal king, that had about him but a thin shadow of sovereignty, Dost thou now govern Israel, and not make thy will any way take place? Much more might it here be said, Dost thou govern the world? Art thou not God? Yes ! and may freely say, I can the less, for that I am. God, do what is not Godlike; that is, can therefore the less break through established, eternal measures, and counteract myself. I must do as becomes Him, for whom and by whom are all things. Others may assume to themselves an imagined, unhallowed liberty of pursuing, at the next, their own inclinations; but it is beneath divine greatness to do so. Yet in this case (it may be further said) why did not love to his Son preponderate? Which our Lord himself in great part obviates by what is subjoined ” because I lay down my life;” how? With a power and design to take it again, as v.18. “I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again: this is a matter agreed. I am not to lie under a perpetual death; that could neither be grateful to my Father, nor is in itself possible. But as things are stated, I am prepared to endure the cross, and despise the shame, for the joy set before me; which joy will be everlastingly common to him and me, and to the whole redeemed community, according to their measure.” But was all this unnecessary trifling? What serious man’s reverence of Deity can let him endure to harbour so profane a thought! Therefore take we now the entire state of this matter, as it lies plainly in view before us, in these texts of Scripture : first, here is an unexpressible love of God to undone, lost sinners: secondly, here is a plain intimation that this love must have been under a suspension and restraint, if God’s own Son had not laid down his life for them: thirdly, it is as plainly signified, that the Son of God’s laying down his life for them, was, in divine estimate, a sufficient expedient to prevent this restraint upon his love to sinners…

John Howe, “The Living Temple,” in Works, (Hunt edition, 1822), 1:390-391.

Credit to Tony.

8
Nov

A Dort delegate on John 3:16

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism

–LUD. CROCIUS 962: “The object of the grace of compassion is the whole human race as wretched and fouled with sin. This is what our Saviour teaches by the word “world” Jn. 3. 16 (God so loved the world. . .). It is certain that here by the word “world” is to be understood not the entire system of heaven and earth with all their denizens divinely produced out of nothing, but only the human race.–963: Nor yet does Christ here understand by the world the elect only, according as they have already been separated from the world, but the entire human race taken all together (universe), according as by nature it lies in sin and according as it is commonly called through the gospel to repentance and faith in Christ”.

Source: Heinrich Heppe, Reformed Dogmatics (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1978), 372. Full name: Ludovigus Crocius (Bremen) c1636.

11
Sep

Pierre Viret (1511-1571) on God’s Love to the World

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism

Of man, and of creation and of fall of him by sin. Chap. 9.

As for man, the Christian says holds, that he was created to the image of God, in the estate of innocency, truth, and justice: and that he being fallen from that estate, by his own sin, and through his own fault, following the counsel of the devil, he has yielded himself in such sort slave of sin, by the which he has deserved eternal death and damnation, by the just judgement of God, that he can not of himself but sin, and daily to provoke more and more the wrath and curse of God upon him.

Of the redemption and restoring of man, and of the only mediator Jesus Christ. Chap. 10

Therefore, God his creator having pity on him, has loved the world, that he has given his only son Jesus Christ, for mediator, patron, advocate, and intercessor between him and man, to reconcile them to him, even when they were his enemies. Wherefore it follows, that he has done this, not having regard to any deserving of man, who neither had nor could deserve but only eternal death, but has only regarded his own goodness and mercy. Wherefore as there is but one only God, creator, governor & conserver of all things, nor any other saviour than he, nor in whom man may trust, nor worship, nor invocate: no more is there likewise but one only mediator Jesus Christ, by whom man may have access to God, and find favour in his sight and recover that which through his own fault has lost.

[John 3:b; 1 John 1.a, & 4.b c, & .9.b; 1 Timo. 2.b; Rom. 8.g &. 5.b; 2 Timo. 1.c; The. 3.b; Esay. 43.b & 44.2; Jerem. 17.a; Exod. 30.a; Deutero. 6.c & 10.d; Matt. 4.b; Luke 4.b; 1 Timo. 2.b; Ich 14. & 15.a]

Peter Veret, A Christian Instruction, conteyning the law and the gospel. Also a Summarie of the Principall poyntes of the Christian fayth and Religion, and of the abuses and errors contrary to the same, translated by I.S. (Imprinted at London by Abraham Veale, dwelling in Paules churchyard at the signe of the Lambe, 1573), 10-11. [Verses as cited from marginal reference.]

From Muller:

Pierre Viret: “…studied in Paris but renounced his training and joined William Farel in the Swiss reform (1531). He taught at Bern (1537) and served as preacher in Geneva, Lausanne and Lyons. His systematic works include: Exposition familiere sur le Symbole des Apostres (1560); Exposition de la doctrine de la foy chrestienne 1564; and Instruction chrestienne en la doctrine de la loy et de l’Evangile (1525) Richard Muller, Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics, 1:41 (1st edition).

Viret also worked with Calvin and Beza in Geneva.

31
Aug

Dabney on 1 John 2:2 and John 3:16 (and 2 Cor 5:15)

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism

Dabney

But there are others of these passages, to which I think, the candid mind will admit, this sort of explanation is inapplicable. In John 3:16, make “the world” which Christ loved, to mean “the elect world,” and we reach the absurdity that some of the elect may not believe, and perish. In 2 Cor. 5:15, if we make the all for whom Christ died, mean only the all who live unto Him—i. e., the elect it would seem to be implied that of those elect for whom Christ died, only a part will live to Christ. In 1 John 2:2, it is at least doubtful whether the express phrase, “whole world,” can be restrained to the world of elect as including other than Jews. For it is indisputable, that the Apostle extends the propitiation of Christ beyond those whom he speaks of as “we,” in verse first. The interpretation described obviously proceeds on the assumption that these are only Jewish believers. Can this be substantiated? Is this catholic epistle addressed only to Jews? This is more than doubtful. It would seem then, that the Apostle’s scope is to console and encourage sinning believers with the thought that since Christ made expiation for every man, there is no danger that He will not be found a propitiation for them who, having already believed, now sincerely turn to him from recent sins.

Dabney, Lectures, p., 525.

30
Aug

William G.T. Shedd (1820-1894) on John 3:16:

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism

Shedd:

1) These two forms and grades of grace, so plainly described in the Scripture texts above cited, are mentioned in the Westminster Confession, vii. 3, “Many by his fall, having made himself incapable of life by that [legal] covenant, the Lord was pleased to make a second, commonly called the covenant of grace, wherein he freely offered unto sinners life and salvation by Jesus Christ, requiring of them faith it him, that they may be saved, and promising to give unto all those that are ordained to life his Holy Spirit, to make them willing and able to believe.” According to this statement there are two things contained in the covenant of grace: (a) An offer to sinners of life and salivation by Jesus Christ, requiring of them faith in him, that they may be saved; and (b) a promise to give unto all those that are ordained to life the Holy Spirit, to make them willing and able to believe. The “offer” in the covenant of grace is made to all sinners without exception, but the “promise” in the covenant is made only to “those that are ordained to life,” or the elect. Ths “offer” ie common grace; the “promise” is special grace. The “offer” is taught in such Scriptures as, “Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth shall be saved.” Mark 10:15. “God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” John 3: 16. The “promise” is taught in such Scriptures as, “A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you, and I will take away the stony heart of flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh,” Ezek. 30: 26, 27. “All that the Father giveth me shall come te me; and him that cometh to me [because given by the Father] I will in no wise cast out, No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me, draw him.” John 6:87,44. William G.T. Shedd, Calvinism Pure and Mixed (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1893), 97-98.

2) The greater includes the less. If God’s mercy is great enough to move him to make a vicarious atonement for man’s sin, it is certainly great enough to move him to secure the consequences of such an act. If God’s compassion is great enough to induce him to lay man’s punishment upon his own Son, it is surely great enough to induce him not to lay it upon the believer. If God so loves the world as to atone vicariously for its sin, he certainly so loves it as to remit its sin.W.G.T. Shedd, Dogmatic Theology, 2:393.

3) Sometimes the term “world” means all mankind, in distinction from the Jews.Matthew 26:13, “This gospel shall be preached in the whole world.” Matthew 13:38, “The field is the world.” John 3:16, “God so loved the world.” 1 Corinthians 1:21, “By wisdom the world knew not God.” 2 Corinthians 5:19, “Reconciled the world unto himself.” 1 John 2:2, “Propitiation for the sins of the whole world.” These texts teach that redemption is intended for all races, classes, and ages of men. W.G.T. Shedd, Dogmatic Theology, 2:480.