Vermigli:

1) If a Ethnic [Pagan] hear that Christ was raised from the dead, he will think it to be a fable. But a Christian not only believes that the same was done, but also will not doubt but that he himself as a member of Christ shall one day be raised up from the dead. Afterward Chrisostom comes to the visible Sacrament, and says: If an Infidel see Baptism, he will judge that there is but water only: but the faithful behold the washing of the soul by the blood of Christ. Peter Martyr, “Of Sacraments, namely Circumcision,” in The Common Places, trans., and complied by Anthonie Martin, 1583, part 4, p., 97.

2) There is offered unto us remission of sins, in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. And yet ought we not to think that it is given by reason of the work wrought as they use to speak: as though a holiness, or the spirit lay hidden in the water, and that it can regenerate us by the outward touching. For it is not so, but by the word of GOD, and the outward sign is signified unto us our reconciliation with God made by Christ: upon which reconciliation if we lay hold by faith, we are both justified and also sanctified. Wherefore Augustine upon John says: “From whence comes this so great a virtue unto the water, that it should touch the body and wash the heart, unless the word wrought it: not in that it is spoken, but that it is believed. But in infants which by reason of age cannot yet believe the Holy Ghost works in their hearts in the stead of faith. The effusion also of the Holy Ghost is promised in baptism, as it is expressly written in the Epistle to Titus, “Who has saved us by the fountain of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost which he has plentifully poured upon us. Peter Martyr, “Of Baptism,” in The Common Places, trans., and complied by Anthonie Martin, 1583, part 4, p., 113.

3) Aristotle denies that children can be happy, but we on the other side affirm them to be happy, seeing Christ said, “Suffer them to come unto me,” (Mar 10:14), he embraces them with great favour, and with singular clemency. We know, indeed, that they as yet cannot be workers of excellent actions, but yet by Christ both original sin is forgiven them, and a way unto eternal life is opened to them. Peter Martyr, The Common Places, trans., and complied by Anthonie Martin, 1583, part 1, pp., 157-158.

4) Lastly, unto sin death is due as a reward (Rom. 6:23.): therefore, where no sin is, there death can have no place. For this only appertains unto the Son of God, to die an innocent; For he died for our sins: but we therefore, die; because we be not without sin. And if it be so, then let us see what our adversaries can allege; why infants, which be now born anew in Christ, do die? For actual sins they have not, and the guiltiness or blame of original sin is taken away: there remains only lust and corruption of nature, not wholly amended: & corrupt motions, which Augustine in his eleventh book of confessions says, are found in infants; and he does confess, and accuses them as sins: and therefore, seeing these be sins, they do not unjustly die for them….

But they will object unto is, that we do injury against baptism, if we say that sin is not taken away thereby. But we cannot justly be accused of this crime: for we affirm that the guiltiness or imputation of fault is taken away by regeneration. For although these vices remain, as does the scripture declare, and experience teaches, yet their bond [of punishment] and guiltiness is discharged. Wherefore Augustine sundry times says; that Concupicience indeed remains, but the blame is taken away by Christ. Peter Martyr, The Common Places, trans., and complied by Anthonie Martin, 1583, part 2, pp., 272 and 274.

5] [Theses for Debate:]

14. PROPOSITIONS FROM THE I6th AND 7th CHAPTERS OF
GENESIS

NECESSARY

14.N.1. The covenant of the fathers and what we have now after the
coming of Christ, are the same regarding the foundation which is Christ,
although there is some diversity in rites and ceremonies.

14.N.2. Circumcision and baptism are the same in regard to the matter
of the sacrament, despite the difference of ceremony.

14.N.3. The infants of Christians belong to God at birth no less than did
the children of the Jews in antiquity; therefore, in the same way they should be baptized with water as those were circumcised.

14.N.4. A sacrament is an outward sign instituted by God to signify and
exhibit grace to those who rightly receive it.

14.N.5. Sacraments in the Old Testament not only signified but also
exhibited the grace of God
.

14.N.6. Sacraments are not the cause of grace, but means which God
uses while he sanctifies his own through them
.

14.N.7. Sacraments are not such necessary means that God has tied his power to them completely as though he could not give salvation without them.

14.N.8, Just as sacraments cannot be neglected without the severest
fault, even so are they received with the greatest benefit.

Peter Martyr Vermigli,”Theses for Debate: Propositions from Genesis,” in Early Writings: Creed, Scripture, Church, trans., by Mariano Di Gangi and Joseph C. McLelland, (Kirksville, Missouri: Sixteenth Century Essays and Studies, 1994), 1:107.

6) 38.N. 11. Baptisms were before the Law, within the Law, and under the Gospel; in regard to their substance all have the same efficacy.

38.N. 12. It is not true that the ceremonies of the old fathers were only outward exercises in which there was no remission of sins.

Peter Martyr Vermigli,”Theses for Debate: Propositions from Genesis,” in Early Writings: Creed, Scripture, Church, trans., by Mariano Di Gangi and Joseph C. McLelland, (Kirksville, Missouri: Sixteenth Century Essays and Studies, 1994), 1:139.

[Vermigli to Bullinger, an extract from a letter:]

7) The enterprise which all good people were hoping for and which was dear to His Royal Majesty’s heart could not be brought to birth. Things therefore still stay in large part as they were before, except that the Book or Plan of Ecclesiastical Rites and of the Administration of the Sacraments has been revised, for everything that could have fostered superstition has been removed from it. The main reason why the other things that were being proposed did not prevail was because the sacramentarian question blocked the way–not indeed as regards transubstantiation or the real presence (if I may speak that way) either in the bread or in the wine since, thanks be to God, there seems to be no controversy about them among those who profess the Gospel, but many people wavered over whether the sacraments confer grace. There were some who asserted it absolutely and wanted a decision to that effect. Since others saw clearly how many superstitions that opinion carried along with it, at first they tried in every way to show that nothing more should be attributed to the sacraments than to the external word of God, for both kinds of the word signify and show to us the salvation gained for us through Christ. All those who believe in these words and signs partake of that salvation, not indeed through the power of the words and sacraments, but through the efficacy of faith. It was also stipulated that it is impossible to partake worthily of sacraments unless the recipients previously possessed what is signified through the sacraments. Without faith the sacraments are always put to an unworthy use. But if those who come to the sacraments are endowed with faith, through faith they have already taken hold of the grace which is proclaimed to us in the sacraments. The subsequent reception and use of the sacraments is then a seal and sign of a promise already received. Just as through faith the external words of God have power to arouse and awaken a faith that is often lazy and somehow asleep, so too by the power of the Holy Spirit the sacraments can do the same thing. Their use is very helpful in fortifying our otherwise weak minds about the promises and grace of God.

When children are baptized, due to their age they cannot make the assent to the divine promises, which is faith. In them the effect of the sacrament is that the forgiveness of original sin, reconciliation with God, and the grace of the Holy Spirit bestowed on them through Christ are signified in them, and just as they already belong to the church, so they are also visibly grafted into it. Still we should not deny that great good and advantage comes to those who are baptized, whether children or adults, from the invocation of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, which takes place over them, for God always hears the faithful prayers of his church.

We wanted these teachings about the sacraments to be decided and established so that their pure and simple use might finally be restored. But there was an outcry, and many people, including those who were otherwise not unlearned or evil, maintained that grace is conferred, as they say, through the sacraments. They also do not want to concede that children are justified and reborn before baptism. But when it comes to their arguments, there are none which have not been refuted, and that very easily. From this affair no little hostility was stirred up against us because we differed sharply from Augustine. If our teaching had been approved by public authority, they say that then Augustine would have been openly condemned. Why say more? People cannot be torn away from the merit of works. What is even more to be regretted is that they do not want to admit it. There are always infinite roadblocks, and they are mutually reinforcing so that day after day they postpone the restitution of divine worship. What a heavy task it is to bring back the pure truth into the church! But this is no reason to despair; indeed, we are quite confident that things can turn out differently than what has now unhappily transpired. Peter Martyr Vermigli, “Letter No. 72: Peter Martyr to Henry Bullinger,” in Life, Letters and Sermons, trans., by John Patrick Donnelly, (Kirksville, Missouri: Sixteenth Century Essays and Studies, 1999), 5:123-125.

2
Sep

Vermigli on the Free Offer

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism   in The Well-Meant Offer

Vermigli:

1) Now let us see by what means god works so excellent good things un us. First he offers the promises of these things, secondly, by his inspiration by the opening the heart, that those promises may be admitted: which never find place in us; for man’s heart is stubborn and resists spiritual things; and therefore there is need of continual ministry in the church. For it is the duty of pastors, to lay before the people the promises of God, & not only to urge the same with words, but also to seal the same by sacraments, which are certainly visible words. But first of all their part is to remove two impediments, which chiefly lead men away from the promises of God. For on the one part, men think they cannot attain to the promises of God, because they be unworthy of them: here ought a faithful minister diligently to persuade & teach, that these things are freely bestowed by God, not through works, or for any worthiness of the receivers. On the other part, men are wont to doubt, whether themselves, by election of God, be excluded from these promises, or no: here must they teach, that it is the part of the faithful people to receive the promises of God generally, as they taught us in the Holy Scriptures, by the Spirit of God; and that they ought not to be very inquisitive of the secret will of God. For undoubtedly, he would have revealed & declared who be the chosen & reprobate, he had known that the same should be profitable to salvation.

Wherefore, seeing that the Scriptures reject none particularly from the promises, every man ought to harken unto them, as if they should particularly pertain to himself. And certainly, together with faith, there will be a persuasion of the Spirit, given unto the believers; so as they shall not be in any doubt, but that they verily pertain unto the elect…

But this one thing we seem to have affirmed, which as yet is not proved by the Scripture; namely, that God does not only by his mere grace and good will offer the promises, which we have now spoken of; but that he also by his Spirit bends our heart to receive them…

But men are wont to say, and commonly boast, that the grace of God is laid forth to all men; wherefore if the same be not embraced, the fault is in ourselves, for that every man may attain to it if he will. This could we must rid away, by some sort short discourse. Indeed we may grant, that after this sort, grace is set abroad unto all men; because the general promises of God are offered and preached to indifferently to all men. Neither do the preachers, which publish those promises, stick anything about the secret will of God, or else think this with themselves; ‘Peradventure this man is not predestinate;’ or ‘I shall further nothing by my travail’: they imagine no such thing, but they propound the word of God to all men generally. But this means the grace and calling of God may be said to be common unto all men. Albeit, when as any man receives the promises of God offered, he does it not by his own power or will…

Peter Martyr, “Of Grace,” in The Common Places, rans., and compiled by Anthonie Martin, 1583, part 3, pp., 49-50 and 51.

2) But some man will say God by the prophet Jonah, said it should come to pass, that the city of Nineveh should be destroyed, and that after 40 days. And by Isaiah the Prophet h showed unto Hezekiah the king, that he should dye: which things yet came not to pass as they were foretold. Yet also the Lord himself in Jeremy the 18. Chapter thus speaks, “if any man speak of any kingdom; or nation, to root it out and to destroy it and they in the meantime repent, I also will repent me. And on the other side, if I shall speak to plant, and to build any kingdom or nation, and they in the meantime behave themselves wickedly, I will not perform these things which I have spoken. But we answer, that the promise whereof Paul here speaks depends not of any condition, as do a great many promises of the law, unto which pertain these threatenings which are now alleged yea the Apostle himself sufficiently expressed, of what kind of promises he speaks when he says, “By faith, that it should be of grace.” For if it consist freely, then hangs it not on any condition, or supposition, and by this means the promise can in no case be made frustrate. This may the easier be understand by a similitude: If a physician should by taking of any medicine promise health, but yet upon this condition, that he would have for his pains infinite sums of money, & that the sick person should observe a very hard diet, a poor man might easily answer that that promise of health is vain, both for that he has not the money to pay, and also for that being weak he is not able to observe the diet which is prescribed him. But contrariwise, if a man promise a medicine which he will give freely, neither requires any work of the sick person, but only that he would drink, or some other way receive his medicine, this promise is easily made firm. So undoubtedly stands the case here: the promise is offered unto us, and that freely. For only is of us required, that by faith we receive it. And this bus the first principal point, whereupon depends the certainty of the promise: namely, for that the promise consists of the Word of God, and is offered freely.

Peter Martir Vermilius Florentine, Most learned and fruitful Commentaries of D. Peter Martir Vermilius Florentine, Professor of Divinity in he School of Tigure, upon the Epistle of S. Paul to the Romans: wherein are diligently & most profitably entreated all such matters and chief common places of religion touched in the same Epistle, (Imprinted at London by Iohn Daye, 1558), 91[b]-92[a].

Vermigli:

45. They also put forward the statement to Timothy, “God will have all men to be saved (1 Tim 2:4).” Pighius regularly repeats this passage as if it were invincible. Yet Augustine often taught that it may be expounded in such a way that it lends no weight at all to prove their fond invention [Augustin Corrept. 14.44 (PL 44.943); idem, Ep. 217.6.19 (PL 33.985-86); idem, C. Jul. 8.42 (PL 44.75940), idem, Praed. 8.14 (PL 44.971)]. First, we take it to be spoken of all states and kinds of men, that is, that God will have some of all kinds of men to be saved. This interpretation agrees perfectly well with the purpose of the apostle. He had instituted that prayers and supplications should be made for all men, especially kings and those in public authority, so that under them we may live a quiet life in all piety and chastity (Tim. 2:l-2). Therefore, to declare that no state or kind of person is excluded, he added, “God will have all men to be saved.” It is as if he had said that no one is prevented by that calling and level in which he is placed, so long as it is not repugnant to the word of God, but that he may come to salvation; therefore, we should pray for all kinds of men. Yet we cannot infer from this that God endows everyone in particular with grace, or predestines everyone to salvation. Similarly, in the time of the flood, all living creatures are said to have been saved in the ark with Noah, but only some of every kind were gathered together in it.

Or we may understand it like this: God will have all men to be saved, for as many as are saved, they are saved by his will. It is as if one should say of a teacher of rhetoric in a city that he teaches all men. This kind of speech does not mean that all the citizens are hearers of rhetoric, but that as many as learn are taught by him. It is also like someone pointing to the gate of a house and saying that everyone enters this way. We must not understand from this that everyone enters that house, but that as many as enter do so by way of that gate alone.

Third, there are some who interpret these words of the apostle as referring to the signified will or antecedent will, that all men are invited since preaching is set forth to all indifferently. No one fails inwardly to feel some spur by which he is continually stirred up to do well. Thus if we relate this to the will of God, we will easily grant that he will have all men to be saved. They will not have it to be understood of the hidden and effective will which they call the consequent will. In this way one may understand such speech as “God illumines every man who comes into this world and “Come unto me all who are weary and heavy laden,”(John1 9; Matt. 11:21), for all are provoked by the oracles of God and all are inwardly moved by some spur.

All these interpretations are quite probable and also fitting, yet beside these there is another, both ready and plain. The Holy Scriptures set forth two human societies: one of the godly and the other of the ungodly. Both societies have universal propositions attached which should be restricted to their own category by j the careful reader. The prophets say, and Christ cites them: “All shall be taught by God (theodidaktos) and all shall know me from the least to the greatest”; and again he says, “When I shall be lifted up from the earth, I will draw all things to myself (John:4 5; Jer. 31:33). Unless these universal propositions refer to the godly who are elected, they are not true. This is also true of these passages: “I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh” and “All flesh shall come in my sight and shall worship in Jerusalem:’ and again, “All flesh shall see the salvation of God:’ and finally, “God lifts up all who fall (Joel 2: 28; Isa. 66:23; Luke 35; Ps. 145:14). Who does not see that these passages are to be understood only of the saints?

In contrast, these following passages refer to the ungodly: “No one receives his testimony” yet many believed, and “You will be hated by all.” Again it is stated, “They all seek after their own interests”; and “They have all turned aside together; they have become corrupt. There is no one who does good, not even one” (John 3: 32; Matt. 10:22; Phil. 2:21; Ps. 14:3). Those who are pious and regenerate are acceptable to God and endeavor to show him some obedience to the law, but these universal sayings should not be extended beyond their own society.

Augustine had this distinction in mind in his book The City of God, where he proves that there have always been two cities, one the city of God and the other the city of the devil. Therefore, in these general propositions we must always give due consideration as to which class or group of men they refer. If we do so here, we will apply the statement to the saints and the elect, namely, that “God will have all men to be saved”: and so all doubt is removed. Otherwise, it seems that God does not effectively will the salvation of all men, as is demonstrated by the many infants who have perished without Christ and many also which have been born fools, and deaf, and never had the right and proper use of reason. It often happens that some have had long lives, honest and faithful enough, and yet suddenly fall at last and are taken out of the world to perish eternally. Others, on the contrary, who have perpetually led a life of wickedness, are at the end of their lives endowed with faith and repentance and are saved. Yet they I might have been taken away first, so that evil would not have changed their minds. Who will in these examples say that God wills the salvation of all with the same effectiveness? They bring up a saying of Christ’s: “How often would I have gathered your children together as a hen gathers her chicks, and you would not?” (Matt. 23:37) Here also it is the antecedent will of the sign that is meant. God through his prophets, preachers, apostles, and Scriptures invited the Jews to fly to him by repentance time after time, but they refused, but by his effective will, which is called consequent, he always drew to himself those who were his. Nor was there any age when he did not gather as many of the Hebrews as he had predestined. Therefore, as Augustine said, those that I would, I have gathered together, although you would not.

Peter Martyr Vermigli, Predestination and Justification, trans., by Frank A. James, (Kirksville, Missouri: Sixteenth Century Essays and Studies, 2003), 8:62-64.

Vermigli:

Unlimited redemption:

1) This word predestination will signify nothing else than the eternal ordinance of God regarding his creatures (Dei de creaturis suis aeternam dispositionem), relating to a certain use. The Scriptures do not often use the word predestination in this sense except with reference to the elect alone. Although in Acts 4 we read “they assembled together to do whatever your hand and purpose predestined to happen” (Acts 4:28). If these words refer to the death of Christ and the redemption of mankind, they do not pass beyond the bounds of election to salvation; if they include those who gathered together against the Lord, they also include the reprobate. Let us make our judgments based on how the Scriptures most often use the term predestination. Peter Martyr Vermigli, Predestination and Justification, trans., by Frank A. James, (Kirksville, Missouri: Sixteenth Century Essays and Studies, 2003), vol., 8, p., 16.

2) “They [the anti-predestinarians] also grant that “Christ died for us all” and infer from this that his benefits are common to everyone. We gladly grant this, too, if we are considering only the worthiness of the death of Christ, for it might be sufficient for all the world’s sinners. Yet even if in itself it is enough, yet it did not have, nor has, nor will have effect in all men. The Scholastics also acknowledge the same thing when they affirm that Christ redeemed all men sufficiently but not effectually.” Peter Martyr Vermigli, Predestination and Justification, trans., by Frank A. James, (Kirksville, Missouri: Sixteenth Century Essays and Studies, 2003), vol., 8, p., 62.

3) FROM PSALM 74: If it were to happen, O almighty God, which we do not doubt often occurs, that we provoke your wrath against us because of the sins that we have just committed and we bring down the heavy whips which chastise us: remember, I entreat, your goodness and promises which you know we have laid hold of by faith. Do not hand our souls over to the power of those who oppose your glory and our salvation. They strive for nothing but destroying your works or making them useless and bringing to naught the salvation of the human race which you purchased by your mercy. All their efforts are finally aimed at making your name blasphemed and vilified. We ask you to remember how you previously conferred benefits on us. Do not put an end to the work of redemption you have already begun in us. Arise, O God, and assist those who call on you lest the plans of the wicked enjoy success either against your glory or against our salvation. Through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen. Peter Martyr Vermigli, Sacred Prayers, trans., by John Patrick Donnelly, (Kirksville, Missouri: Sixteenth Century Essays and Studies, 1994), vol 3, p., 69.

4) Even Christ himself, when he had been raised from the dead, carried back with him the scars from his wounds and said to doubting Thomas, “Put your fingers here… in my side and in the nail marks, and do not be faithless, but believing” ((John 20:27). The wounds had already performed their function, for by them the human race was redeemed, but he still had them after he was raised from the dead, that his body might be displayed as the same one which had suffered earlier. Peter Martyr Vermigli, “Resurrection: Commentary on 2 Kings 4″in Philosophical Works, trans., by Joseph P. McLelland, (Kirksville, Missouri: Sixteenth Century Essays and Studies, 1994), vol 4, p., 113.

Read the rest of this entry »

I am the person whom when befouled by the filth and mud of crimes you cleansed with the blood of Jesus Christ, you enlightened by the Spirit, you restored to a holy life, and made the heir, fellow, and partaker of eternal happiness. What more could I have ever asked of you since you have given me all things with Christ?… Since you took pity on the falls of your weak and foolish creature, through your prophet you indicated that you did not wish the death of the sinner but that he be converted and live. You wish to receive back the wretched sinner not just once but seven times seventy should that be needed, if he repents and returns to your flock. See, here I am, condemning, hating, revoking, renouncing whatever I did against your dignity and your holy will. I protest that I will order my whole life in a better way. So I ask you, good Father, seeing that you have so encouraged me through Jesus Christ our Lord, that you will to bestow on me such strength as may suffice. I am your work, both as regards my natural constitution and as regards this new spiritual regeneration. Therefore I beg you not to despise me–may that which cannot be done through my merits (I can find no good in them), be done through the merits of Jesus Christ and through your holy name, to which be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen.

Peter Martyr Vermigli, “Letter No. Letter No. 152: To the Brethren at Lucca,” in Life, Letters and Sermons, trans., by John Patrick Donnelly, (Kirksville, Missouri: Sixteenth Century Essays and Studies, 1999), 5:163-164.