Notice: register_sidebar_widget is deprecated since version 2.8.0! Use wp_register_sidebar_widget() instead. in /home/q85ho9gucyka/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3931
Calvin and Calvinism » Hypothetical Universalism, Amyraldianism, Cameron, Amyraut, and Testard
8
May

Hypothetical Universalism, Amyraldianism, Cameron, Amyraut, and Testard

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism   in

Hypothetical Universalism, Amyraldianism, Amyraut, and Testard

  1. Amyraut on the ordering of the decrees
  2. Amyraut affirms the classic Lombardian distinctions
  3. Testard affirms the classic Lombardian distinctions (by way of Donald Grohman)
  4. The “Preface” to the Formula Consensus Helvetica: Amyraut, Placaeus, and Daillé, as Fraternal Brothers in the Body of Christ
  5. Theophilus Gale (1628-1678) on Davenant and Amyraut
  6. Peter van Mastricht (1630-1706) on Cameron and Amyraut as “Reformed” and “Orthodox” (Informal References)
  7. John Cameron (1579-1625) and Festus Hommius (1576-1642): The Synod of Dort and Regeneration
  8. Philip Schaff (1819-1893) on John Henry Heidegger on Amyraldianism: Disapproved Of, But Not Heresy
  9. Laurence Proctor on Amyraut’s “Christ Died Equally For All”
  10. Donald Grohman on Turretin on Amyraut as Reformed
  11. Richard Muller on Amyraut
  12. Richard Muller on Non-Amyraldian Precedents to Hypothetical Universalism
  13. Richard Muller on Hypothetical Universalism and the Reformed Tradition
  14. Carl R. Trueman on Amyraldianism
  15. Benjamin Inman on Turretin on Amyraldianism
  16. Aaron C. Denlinger on Robert Baron (c. 1596-1639), Hypothetical Universalism, and Reformed Orthodoxy
Back to Main
Back to Top