Archive for the ‘Divine Hatred’ Category

7
Dec

Richard Stock (1569-1626) on Divine Hatred

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism

Stock:

Psal. 5:51 Thou hates all the workers of iniquity.

The next thing is, the Hatred of God: and to hold the same course we have held before, our first question is this:

Quest. What is the hated of God?

Answ. The is thus much, the hatred of God is a communicable attribute, whereby he freely decrees not to show mercy, but to deny to most the grace of election, destining them to destruction, exactly punishing them when they are wicked, and so hating all iniquity.

This description has a great deal of matter in it, therefore, we will explain it. Hatred, say some, is not to be attributed to God, we do not contend against them if they understand hatred to be a passion of the mind, which is seldom without corruption, but when they take hatred, as the Scriptures speak of it, then as God loves that which is good, so he hates that which is nought and evil: for as God is said to love, so he is said to hate. Again, I say it is a communicable attribute, because that there is the like in man.

Next, it is that by which he freely decrees not to show mercy to the wicked, to deny them the grace of election. To open this, hatred in the Scriptures does many times signify to refuse, to give and deny favors, to put behind, and make less account of than another, as our Savior Christ says, Luke 14:26, “He that hates not his father and his mother,” &c., that is, he does not deny his father, by putting him behind him, and neglecting him, when he commands anything, and God another. God say that Leah was hated, so that is, was not so dearly loved as Rachel, so this hatred of God is to neglect to show favor, and to deny the grace of election to the wicked. This is apparent, Rom. 9:13, “I have hated Esau, and loved Jacob,” This is not put down but with opposition: “I have loved Jacob, and hated Esau,” that is to say, I have not decreed nor offered this grace and favor of election to Esau, which I have allowed Jacob. It is that which is further manifest in the 18th verse of the same chapter, “I will have mercy on whom I will, and whom I will harden,” &c. This God does freely from his own will. His will is the solitary cause of denying the grace of election. The cause of why he chose Jacob, and hated Esau, was nothing but his will. It is manifest, Rom. 9:11, 12, before they had done anything good or evil, God said, that the elder should serve the younger, that it might be of grace. If you ask the Apostle a proof of this, he alleges a place out of Exodus: if any man should wrangle with God and say, God is unjust, that he should love one, and hate another, the Apostle answers, “There is no unrighteousness with God,” verse 14, and for this he gives a proof, Exod. 23:19, “I will mercy on whom I will have mercy, and whom I will,” &c. As God does absolutely love whom he will, so he does absolutely hate whom he will, he denies the grace of election to the most, there are but a few that have favor, Matt. 20:16, “Many are called.” The thing is, that he destines them to destruction, as punishment of sin, Jude 4, “men were before of old ordained to this condemnation”: “he has prepared tophet2 of old,” Esa 30[:33] ult, not that God does delight in torment of the creature, or created anything that he might destroy it, but out of his hatred to sin, and love of justice, did decree and prepare to punish all, and only such as should live and die in sin, without repentance. That negative act of reprobation, or preterition finds all men alike, in the same condition, this positive act of predamnation, respects men as sinners, without repentance. That first act is grounded only in his absolute will of God, “I will have mercy on whom I will,” &c., “and whom I will harden,” but this latter act is an act not so much of power as of justice, and always has respect to sin.

The third thing, That he actually punishes them when they are wicked: it is manifest, that they that be born in sin, live in sin, knowing it to be sin, be enemies of God, and to the grace of God, and them he actually hates when they are wicked. This is apparent, “Thou hates all those that work wickedness,” and that hatred carries the punishment, as appears by the next words of my text, “and thou destroys all those that tell lies,” and, therefore, he does not hate them as they are men, and his creatures, but as they are wicked. Bernard says, that man could not endure after God’s making, but he would be better. Therefore, he was cast out of Paradise: God hating all iniquity in whomsoever it was, elect or reprobate, Psal. 45:7, “Thou loves righteousness, and hates iniquity.” And this I might show unto you, that there is no sin almost, but I can bring you a plain text of God’s hatred of it, sometimes hating idolatry, sometimes hating blood, sometimes false weights, sometimes contempt of his Word, sometimes wicked thoughts, all which show that he hates iniquity: two ways he manifests he hates it, in some, because he destroys them for it, in others, because he took it away by justice, in is own Son. And thus much for this description.

Richard Stock, A Stock of Divine Knowledge. Being a Lively Description of the Divine Nature. Or, the Divine Essence, Attributes, and Trinity Particularly Explained and Profitably Applied. The First showing Us What God is: The Second, what We Ought to be (London: Printed by T.H. for Philip Nevil, and are to be sold at his Shop in Ivie Lane, at the Signe of the Gun, 1641), 224-226. [Some spelling modernized; some sentence restructuring; contents in brackets mine; footnotes mine; and underlining mine.]

____________________

1The original incorrectly cites Psalm 6:6.

2Hebrew, Tophteh, a place of fire.

5
Jul

John Stoughton (1593?-1639) on the Wrath of God

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism

Stoughton:

Now, then man was no sooner made but he rebelled against his maker, he that was right, was fat and kicked against his Lord, and we in him: we were, sons of prevarication, and the sons of perdition, ex illo fluere, from that fountain springs all misery: we have all sinned against the Lord, and therefore his evil is upon us: hence it is that our minds are blind, the crows of the valley have picked our eyes: our will’s lame, to anything that is good, our nature caught a fall, like Mephibosheth, in the cradle of her infancy, and we could never outgrow it: hence it is that our bodies are subject to deformities, infirmities, death, and our souls and bodies to the wrath of God, which lies heavy upon us here, prosecuting us with armies of plagues, and will never leave us till it has brought us (unless his mercy prevents us) to eternal torments, and sunk us into the bottom of hell.

No marvel then, if Plato complain that the soul has broken her wings: if poets tell us of an iron age: if whole volumes be filled with declamations of brevity of man’s life, and the miseries of mankind. No, I marvel not, if the who had but one eye saw these things, even through the clouds of obscurity: I marvel rather, that among Christians, who have both their eyes, the eye of reason, and the eye of faith, and besides, live in the sunshine of the Gospel, so few see this, as they did, or at least the reason of this, which they could not.

I marvel I hear no more cry out with Saint Paul, “O miserable man that I am, who shall deliver me from this body of death?” For if Paul so pathetically cried out, who could so triumphantly give thanks; how much more justly may we, if we cannot add that which follows, reiterate the same again, and say: “O Miserable man that I am, who shall deliver me from this body of death?”

You see now the misery of a natural man, consisting in the conscience of sin, and the consequence of sin, the fault and the guilt, malum cuplæ: this is the misery of man, which estranges him far from the state of happiness: and out of this you may gather what salvation is. For every salve supposes a sore, and the sore is sin and pain, and therefore the salve is that which will free us from this horrible condition: and restore, and reinstate us into the favor of the Lord, and so into our former felicity. This is what I mean by salvation.

John Stoughton, “1 Corinth. 2.2. For I determined to know nothing among you, but Christ Jesus, and him Crucified,” in XV Choice Sermons Preached Vpon Selected Occasions (London: Printed for I. Bellamie, H. Overton, I. Rothwell, R. Royston, D. Frere, and R. Smith, 1640), 22-23. [Some spelling modernized; italics original; marginal reference not included; and underlining mine.]

Foxe:

We have now made manifest unto you, hat all the tyranny of DEATH is extinguished, and we delivered from the servile yoke thereof, by the means, and conquest of this our Triumphant PRINCE. When I say DEATH, I understand also thereby the whole army or violence of mischiefs, which any ways annoy our life, both these which were the cause of DEATH, and those also that accompany, and follow it.

The Law
abrogated by
Christ. Rom. 6.

For DEATH, of itself is nothing else, but the punishment, and wages for SIN, (according to Paul’s saying) even as “the strength of SIN is the law.” For where no Law is, there is no Transgression, “there the wrath of God is revealed from Heaven, against all ungodliness of men, which withhold the truth in unrighteousness.” And to this wrath we were all sometime subject, “being dead in Sin and serving Satan the Prince of this world,” under whose kingdom we were all wretched, and miserable. For what greater thrall, or more extreme misery could there happen, than that SATAN, troubling, and disturbing all things as he listed [wished], should bear all the sway, and alone usurp the kingdom, being not conquerable by any force of Nature, or power of Prince? All things being thus in a desperate case, the more glorious did the power of this our grand Champion appear, who with a marvelous victory, and singular overthrow, by suffering subdued the Enemy, and having vanquished the tyranny of DEATH by death, opened the everlasting gate of immortality to all that would come and enter therein. Wherefore he willing to communicate the fruit of this his benefit with all, who draws all unto himself, cries in the Gospel, saying, “Come under me, all you that labor, and are heaven laden, and I will refresh you,” [Matt. 11.]. And as he does accept all sorts of men, in that he invites, and allures all: so he excepts [excludes] no of burden, or grief, who promises that he will refresh us in all, and disburden us of them all.

John Foxe, Christ Triumphant (London: Printed by Iohn Daye, and Richard his Sonne, dwelling at Aldergate, 1579), 13a-41a. [Some reformatting, some spelling modernized; marginal references cited inline; square bracketed insert mine; and underlining mine.]

[Note: This point is important in the light 1) of the drift into the hypercalvinist doctrine of eternal justification (Gill, Hoeksema, et al); and 2) the tendency to deny that the living unbelieving elect were ever actually objects of and recipients of the punishing wrath of God (Owen, Girardeau, et al). Such a denial directly contradicts the plain force of Scripture.]

Reformed Confessions:

Second Helvetic Confession

Second Helvetic Confession 13:
The Ancients Had Evangelical Promises. The Gospel, is indeed, opposed to the law. For the law works wrath and announces a curse, whereas the Gospel preaches grace and blessing. John says: For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ (John 1:17). Yet not withstanding it is most certain that those who were before the law and under the law, were not altogether destitute of the Gospel. For they had extraordinary evangelical promises such as these are: The seed of the woman shall bruise the serpent’s head (Gen. 3:15). In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed (Gen. 22:18). The scepter shall not depart from Judah . . . until he comes (Gen. 49:10). The Lord will raise up a prophet from among his own brethren (Deut. 18:15; Acts 3:22), etc.

Second Helvetic Confession 20:
What it Means To Be Baptized. Now to be baptized in the name of Christ is to be enrolled, entered, and received into the covenant and family, and so into the inheritance of the sons of God; yes, and in this life to be called after the name of God; that is to say, to be called a son of God; to be cleansed also from the filthiness of sins, and to be granted the manifold grace of God, in order to lead a new and innocent life. Baptism, therefore, calls to mind and renews the great favor God has shown to the race of mortal men. For we are all born in the pollution of sin and are the children of wrath. But God, who is rich in mercy, freely cleanses us from our sins by the blood of his Son, and in him adopts us to be his sons, and by a holy covenant joins us to himself, and enriches us with various gifts, that we might live a new life. All these things are assured by baptism. For inwardly we are regenerated, purified, and renewed by God through the Holy Spirit; and outwardly we receive the assurance of the greatest gifts in the water, by which also those great benefits are represented, and, as it were, set before our eyes to be beheld.

Second Helvetic Confession 8:
Sin. By sin we understand that innate corruption of man which has been derived or propagated in us all from our first parents, by which we, immersed in perverse desires and averse to all good are inclined to all evil. Full of all wickedness, distrust, contempt and hatred of God, we are unable to do or even to think anything good of ourselves. Moreover, even as we grow older, so by wicked thoughts, words and deeds committed against God’s law, we bring forth corrupt fruit worthy of an evil tree (Matt. 12:33 ff.). For this reason by our own deserts, being subject to the wrath of God, we are liable to just punishment, so that all of us would have been cast away by God if Christ, the Deliverer, had not brought us back.

Death. By death we understand not only bodily death, which all of us must once suffer on account of sins, but also eternal punishment due to our sins and corruption. For the apostle says: We were dead through trespasses and sins . . . and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind. But God, who is rich in mercy . . . even when we were dead through our tresspasses, made us alive together with Christ (Eph. 2:1 ff.). Also: As sin came into the world through one man and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all men sinned (Rom. 5:12).

French Confession

French Confesion 18:
We believe that all our justification rests upon the remission of our sins, in which also is our only blessedness, as says David (Psa. 32:2).[1]  We therefore reject all other means of justification before God,[2] and without claiming any virtue or merit, we rest simply in the obedience of Jesus Christ, which is imputed to us as much to blot out all our sins as to make us find grace and favor in the sight of God.  And, in fact, we believe that in falling away from this foundation, however slightly, we could not find rest elsewhere, but should always be troubled.  For as much as we are never at peace with God till we resolve to be loved in Jesus Christ, for of ourselves we are worthy of hatred.

Thirty-Nine Articles

Article 9:
Original sin stands not in the following of Adam, (as the Pelagians do vainly talk;) but it is the fault and corruption of the Nature of every man, that naturally is engendered of the offspring of Adam; whereby man is very far gone from original righteousness, and is of his own nature inclined to evil, so that the flesh lusts always contrary to the Spirit; and therefore in every person born into this world, it deserves God’s wrath and damnation. And this infection of nature doth remain, yea in them that are regenerated; whereby the lust of the flesh, called in Greek, (which some do expound the wisdom, some sensuality, some the affection, some the desire, of the flesh), is not subject to the Law of God. And although there is no condemnation for them that believe and are baptized; yet the Apostle doth confess, that concupiscence and lust hath of itself the nature of sin.

Belgic Confession

Belgic Confession 24:
Therefore He has commanded all those who are His to be baptized with pure water, into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, thereby signifying to us, that as water washes away the filth of the body when poured upon it, and is seen on the body of the baptized when sprinkled upon him, so does the blood of Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit internally sprinkle the soul, cleanse it from its sins, and regenerate us from children of wrath unto children of God. Not that this is effected by the external water, but by the sprinkling of the precious blood of the Son of God; who is our Red Sea, through which we must pass to escape the tyranny of Pharaoh, that is, the devil, and to enter into the spiritual land of Canaan.

Synod of Dort

Dort 1:1:
As all men have sinned in Adam, lie under the curse, and are deserving of eternal death, God would have done no injustice by leaving them all to perish and delivering them over to condemnation on account of sin, according to the words of the apostle: That every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may be brought under the judgment of God (Rom. 3:19). And: For all have sinned, and fall short of the glory of God (Rom. 3:23).  And: For the wages of sin is death (Rom. 6:23).

Read the rest of this entry »

19
Oct

John Davenant on Divine Hatred of Sin and Sinner

   Posted by: CalvinandCalvinism

Davenant:

I answer: They are called ungodly and workers of iniquity, who wilfully serve their ungodly lusts; but the regenerate are not called ungodly or workers of iniquity because thy have within them the latent remains of original sin. Nay, it is their perpetual effort to coerce and subdue this indwelling sin, lest it should again acquire dominion. They are therefore opposers, rather than workers, of iniquity. Nor does it follow that God hates the regenerate for their having in them some dregs of original sin. For the love of God towards the regenerate is not founded on their perfection or absolute purity, but on Christ the Mediator, who has transferred their sins to himself, and thus delivered them from the wrath and hatred of God. We readily admit then, that God hateth these remains of sin, and that he shows his hatred, by daily lessening, and at length eradicating them, by his grace and Spirit; but he does not hate the persons of those to whom they cleave, because Christ by his blood hath expiated their guilt. God therefore has willed to punish sin, which he hates, and hath punished it; but he punished it in Christ, who sustained its penalty instead of all the elect.

The sum of our answer comes to this: A two-fold hatred of sin may be considered in God; for he hates sin, either with a simple hatred, or a hatred which reverts upon the person. He hates the sins which cleave to the justified with this simple hatred, because their persons are reconciled to God; but he hates the sins of the ungodly, with that hatred which reverts upon, or is visited, on their persons, because they have not the ransom of Christ applied to them for the expiation of their sins.

John Davenant, A Treatise on Justification (London: Hamilton, Adams, and Co., 1844), 1:30-31.